Roof-specific report
Roof 9: Wake Forest / BUR
Aged BUR restoration candidate that needs updated condition confirmation and a clear quote path before proposal delivery.
Roof area
68,361 SF
Square footage from the source model roof tab.
Risk score
47/100
Normalized condition, failure likelihood, and impact score.
Recommended action
Restore
Restoration is disproportionately valuable because failure would be cumbersome and high-liability around PTIC offices, elevator, utilities, and multi-floor functions.
Condition worksheet
Technical scoring carried from the roof tab
Physical Condition
60/100
Moisture Presence
72/100
Deck Integrity
68/100
Leak Activity
66/100
Space Criticality
65/100
Financial worksheet
Budget and timing logic
Selected plan
Restore
$376K currently modeled for 2026.
Lifecycle exposure
$378K
Selected spend plus any modeled deferral liability.
IR-adjusted decay
Accelerated Candidate
Moderate BUR / aged | IR tier: Moderate (1.25% estimated wet); annual decay 11.2%.
Owner question
This page does not force one recommendation. It shows the consequence of this roof’s maintain, repair, restore, retrofit, replace, or defer path over time.
IR takeoff worksheet
Moisture signal translated into capital timing
Schematic drawing is a planning placeholder until the exported NIRA takeoff table or marked-up drawing is supplied.
Roof-specific NIRA snippet
Roof 9 scan crop placeholder
Reserved for the thermal/NIRA image crop that corresponds to Roof 9. When supplied, this slot should show the scan snippet used to verify wet SF, anomaly count, and urgency tier.
IR category
Moderate
Color/tier used in dashboard legend and active prioritization.
Estimated wet area
855 SF
1.25% of this roof area; editable placeholder until NIRA export is provided.
Anomalies
6
Survey reference: 2025-02-04; Placeholder confidence.
Decay modifier
1.12x
Modifier applied to annual deterioration in capital-window and deferral calculations.
Moderate moisture-risk placeholder; confirm with updated IR before final restoration quote.
Source: NIRA visual thermal model + workbook/PDF qualitative note: aged BUR
Photos and evidence
Roof photo placeholders
These are designed as proposal-ready slots. Replace each placeholder later with roof photos, IR images, test-cut photos, warranty documents, or annotated plans.
BUR condition overview
Attach roof field and detail photos.
Moisture verification
Attach IR/test-cut backup.
Repair scope areas
Attach photos tied to quote line items.
Capital action options
Owner decision alternatives
Repair
Prepare for restoration
Financial consequence: Prepare for restoration. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Detail repairs, wet-area corrections, and substrate preparation.
Budget basis: $30K
Restore
Lower lifecycle cost
Financial consequence: Lower lifecycle cost. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Restoration/coating system based on workbook allowance.
Budget basis: $376K
Replace
Fallback if restoration criteria fail
Financial consequence: Fallback if restoration criteria fail. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Replacement budget alternative for capital planning.
Budget basis: $1.71M
Quote attachments
Proposal backup placeholders
Restoration proposal
Vendor: TBD
Replacement fallback
Vendor: TBD