Roof-specific report
Roof 8: Ballast EPDM & TPO
Poor-condition ballasted roof where replacement/retrofit assumptions need validation before major capital is committed.
Roof area
174,040 SF
Square footage from the source model roof tab.
Risk score
70/100
Normalized condition, failure likelihood, and impact score.
Recommended action
Maintain / Defer until rentability shift
Poor ballast EPDM/TPO with low rentability; revised workbook says damage exists on concrete deck but no imminent threat to additional damage, so maintenance/deferral can be appropriate until rentability changes.
Condition worksheet
Technical scoring carried from the roof tab
Physical Condition
50/100
Moisture Presence
58/100
Deck Integrity
62/100
Leak Activity
55/100
Space Criticality
65/100
Financial worksheet
Budget and timing logic
Selected plan
Replace
$2.18M currently modeled for 2026.
Lifecycle exposure
$2.18M
Selected spend plus any modeled deferral liability.
IR-adjusted decay
Accelerated / Poor
Poor ballast EPDM/TPO | IR tier: Significant (2.25% estimated wet); annual decay 15.0%.
Owner question
This page does not force one recommendation. It shows the consequence of this roof’s maintain, repair, restore, retrofit, replace, or defer path over time.
IR takeoff worksheet
Moisture signal translated into capital timing
Schematic drawing is a planning placeholder until the exported NIRA takeoff table or marked-up drawing is supplied.
Roof-specific NIRA snippet
Roof 8 scan crop placeholder
Reserved for the thermal/NIRA image crop that corresponds to Roof 8. When supplied, this slot should show the scan snippet used to verify wet SF, anomaly count, and urgency tier.
IR category
Significant
Color/tier used in dashboard legend and active prioritization.
Estimated wet area
3,916 SF
2.25% of this roof area; editable placeholder until NIRA export is provided.
Anomalies
11
Survey reference: 2025-02-04; Placeholder confidence.
Decay modifier
1.25x
Modifier applied to annual deterioration in capital-window and deferral calculations.
Moderate-high moisture risk and poor condition justify scope validation before major replacement capital is committed.
Source: NIRA visual thermal model + workbook/PDF qualitative note: poor ballast EPDM/TPO
Photos and evidence
Roof photo placeholders
These are designed as proposal-ready slots. Replace each placeholder later with roof photos, IR images, test-cut photos, warranty documents, or annotated plans.
Ballast field overview
Attach ballast and membrane overview photos.
EPDM/TPO transitions
Attach seams and interface photos.
Problem areas
Attach ponding, damage, or leak evidence.
Capital action options
Owner decision alternatives
Repair
Stabilize while validating scope
Financial consequence: Stabilize while validating scope. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Localized repairs and leak-control allowance.
Budget basis: $50K
Retrofit
Evaluate lower-cost alternative
Financial consequence: Evaluate lower-cost alternative. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Retrofit allowance if existing assembly and attachment can support it.
Budget basis: $1.37M
Replace
Reset poor-condition roof
Financial consequence: Reset poor-condition roof. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Replacement budget pending contractor validation.
Budget basis: $2.18M
Quote attachments
Proposal backup placeholders
Replacement proposal
Vendor: TBD
Retrofit alternate
Vendor: TBD