Medium RiskOpen

Roof-specific report

Roof 7: Nalco / Roof Area 7

Restoration candidate that should be evaluated before it becomes a Roof 6-style replacement event.

Roof area

116,595 SF

Square footage from the source model roof tab.

Risk score

52/100

Normalized condition, failure likelihood, and impact score.

Recommended action

Restore

High-rentability restoration candidate with 0-6 year viability; workbook notes lean-yes occupancy and recommends nailer inspection / peel-strip validation.

Condition worksheet

Technical scoring carried from the roof tab

Physical Condition

70/100

Moisture Presence

80/100

Deck Integrity

72/100

Leak Activity

70/100

Space Criticality

86/100

Compare restoration now against retrofit/replacement later using current IR data.
High space criticality favors planned intervention over deferral.

Financial worksheet

Budget and timing logic

Selected plan

Restore

$641K currently modeled for 2026.

Lifecycle exposure

$644K

Selected spend plus any modeled deferral liability.

IR-adjusted decay

Accelerated Candidate

<1% wet but aged BUR | IR tier: Trace (0.80% estimated wet); annual decay 10.7%.

Owner question

This page does not force one recommendation. It shows the consequence of this roof’s maintain, repair, restore, retrofit, replace, or defer path over time.

IR takeoff worksheet

Moisture signal translated into capital timing

Roof 7Trace IR tier0.80% estimated wet

Schematic drawing is a planning placeholder until the exported NIRA takeoff table or marked-up drawing is supplied.

Roof-specific NIRA snippet

Roof 7 scan crop placeholder

Reserved for the thermal/NIRA image crop that corresponds to Roof 7. When supplied, this slot should show the scan snippet used to verify wet SF, anomaly count, and urgency tier.

IR category

Trace

Color/tier used in dashboard legend and active prioritization.

Estimated wet area

933 SF

0.80% of this roof area; editable placeholder until NIRA export is provided.

Anomalies

4

Survey reference: 2025-02-04; Placeholder confidence.

Decay modifier

1.07x

Modifier applied to annual deterioration in capital-window and deferral calculations.

Low timing tier

Similar to Roof 5; low moisture but aging makes timing financially important.

Source: Workbook/PDF qualitative note: less than 1% wet but aged BUR

Photos and evidence

Roof photo placeholders

These are designed as proposal-ready slots. Replace each placeholder later with roof photos, IR images, test-cut photos, warranty documents, or annotated plans.

BUR field condition

Attach overview and close-up roof photos.

Placeholder

Drainage and wet areas

Attach IR/drainage validation photos.

Placeholder

Edge/transition details

Attach vulnerable detail photos.

Placeholder

Capital action options

Owner decision alternatives

Repair

Prepare roof for restoration

Needed

Financial consequence: Prepare roof for restoration. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Detail repairs, wet-area correction, and substrate preparation.

Budget basis: $20K

Restore

Capture restoration window

Needed

Financial consequence: Capture restoration window. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Restoration/coating budget based on workbook $/SF assumption.

Budget basis: $641K

Retrofit

Fallback capital reset

Budgetary

Financial consequence: Fallback capital reset. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Retrofit allowance if restoration criteria are not met.

Budget basis: $915K

Quote attachments

Proposal backup placeholders

Restoration proposal

Vendor: TBD

Open
$325K–$390K Attach quote later

Retrofit fallback quote

Vendor: TBD

Open
$550K–$625K Attach quote later
Return to dashboard