Roof-specific report
Roof 5: EcoLab 2
Restoration candidate where timely action may preserve a lower-cost lifecycle option before accelerated aging closes the window.
Roof area
168,000 SF
Square footage from the source model roof tab.
Risk score
53/100
Normalized condition, failure likelihood, and impact score.
Recommended action
Restore
High-value SF with drone photos populated; metadata pending confirmation, but workbook keeps restoration economics viable in a 0-6 year window.
Condition worksheet
Technical scoring carried from the roof tab
Physical Condition
65/100
Moisture Presence
78/100
Deck Integrity
70/100
Leak Activity
68/100
Space Criticality
86/100
Financial worksheet
Budget and timing logic
Selected plan
Restore
$924K currently modeled for 2026.
Lifecycle exposure
$928K
Selected spend plus any modeled deferral liability.
IR-adjusted decay
Accelerated Candidate
<1% wet but aged BUR | IR tier: Trace (0.75% estimated wet); annual decay 10.5%.
Owner question
This page does not force one recommendation. It shows the consequence of this roof’s maintain, repair, restore, retrofit, replace, or defer path over time.
IR takeoff worksheet
Moisture signal translated into capital timing
Schematic drawing is a planning placeholder until the exported NIRA takeoff table or marked-up drawing is supplied.
Roof-specific NIRA snippet
Roof 5 scan crop placeholder
Reserved for the thermal/NIRA image crop that corresponds to Roof 5. When supplied, this slot should show the scan snippet used to verify wet SF, anomaly count, and urgency tier.
IR category
Trace
Color/tier used in dashboard legend and active prioritization.
Estimated wet area
1,260 SF
0.75% of this roof area; editable placeholder until NIRA export is provided.
Anomalies
4
Survey reference: 2025-02-04; Placeholder confidence.
Decay modifier
1.05x
Modifier applied to annual deterioration in capital-window and deferral calculations.
Low wet-insulation signal keeps restoration viable if the owner acts before age closes the window.
Source: Workbook/PDF qualitative note: less than 1% wet but aged BUR
Photos and evidence
Roof photo placeholders
These are designed as proposal-ready slots. Replace each placeholder later with roof photos, IR images, test-cut photos, warranty documents, or annotated plans.
Restoration candidate field
Attach representative membrane field photo.
Wet-area validation
Attach IR/test-cut documentation.
Details and transitions
Attach walls, curbs, drains, and edges.
Capital action options
Owner decision alternatives
Repair
Prepare for restoration
Financial consequence: Prepare for restoration. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Defect repairs and wet insulation removal before coating/restoration.
Budget basis: $30K
Restore
Preserve lower-cost lifecycle option
Financial consequence: Preserve lower-cost lifecycle option. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Restoration/coating system using workbook $/SF budget basis.
Budget basis: $924K
Retrofit
Fallback if restoration window narrows
Financial consequence: Fallback if restoration window narrows. This is one path in the time-based model; scope follows: Retrofit budget alternative if current condition is worse than assumed.
Budget basis: $1.32M
Quote attachments
Proposal backup placeholders
Restoration proposal
Vendor: TBD
Wet-removal allowance
Vendor: TBD